is it a distraction? >> it is a distraction. it's very similar to the voting restriction laws. in both cases you basically have legislative solutions to thing for which there is no problem. so we've seen, for example, a decline in the number of unwanted pregnancies. we've seen a decline in the use of abortion in post-first tri master. a decline in teenage pregnancy. to enter into women's reproductive rights when we don't have a problem is similar to entering into the voter rights when we don't have a voter problem. we hear from the right government should be small. i think this is a reasonable position, ideological position, that government should leave as much freedom as possible. so to say government intervene when there actually aren't problems but not intervene when there are, that's when we know something political and not policy oriented is afoot. >> i want to tell everybody you