actually "the new york times" stumbled on some truth -- think about this. when they reported that the dossier was probably russian disinformation from the p get-g, what were they releasing there? that means, without seeing it come s with a kind of inadvertently were saying, if the russians were involved in te beginning, and they knew about steele feeding this to hillary, as they said it was likely russian disinformation from theec get-go, that means tt the russians were not helping hillary clinton and a 201601 election. that would mean6 they were tryg to screw over donald trump and get hillary elected. an investigation into the or is origins into this witch hunt is f chwell underway but the conspy theorist on msdn seek him a fake news cnn, they are racked with grief. make no mistake, there is no remorse for lying to their beers for nearly three years. they are sad the gig is up.y they've been caught spreading the conspiracy theory.