>> no. that's why it's so important that he was the guy that was named a. couple of other things about his career. first of all, he seem to be a modest guy. he doesn't give press conferences, he doesn't do leaks, he's not a showboater, and he believes people that have done wrong like the fbi agents that dan mentioned, it's no excuse if you're powerful, you can't break the law. but at the same time, he's not someone who's going to gin up a case. he, apparently, is not a thuggish prosecutor in that way. he's hard-nosed but supposedly a straight arrow, and i think that's a what we need in a situation like this to provide the public with a little bit of comfort to think that somebody apolitical is taking a look at this. paul: huge chunk of the public, tens of millions of people suspect that, in fact, law enforcement officials and intelligence officials did attempt to surveil and undermine