his instincts are to get out and let other people handle this but he has now committed to this minimal objective in syria which is whatever else happens, not going to do with chemical weapons. chris: criticism of the president's actions, tweets, strategy as the former top adviser, a top adviser to vice president pence, your response. >> one thing we need to know this is a different attack than last year, last year was mostly focused on delivery and the methods to deliver the weapons, this time they took additional step by reducing syria's ability to produce the weapon, it was a targeted response to degrade their ability to use these weapons in the future and not just how they delivered them like they did last year, so i think it was a furthering of reducing the likelihood that we are going to see -- going to see attacks like this in the future. they'll be residuals, we can't guaranty there won't be any left. chris: what do you think of the