feasible. getting out of it won't hurt us because it was such a toothless agreement. this many countries involved in something and they're all in agreement it probably won't do anything. if this doesn't cause a recession the united states and china it is not strong enough to healthy environment. you are talking about a need to curb consumption, not spend more on alternatives. it doesn't tax consumption, doesn't cut income to offset that, won't do anything. bottom line, these jobs, solar jobs like we heard from john because it is such an efficient way to make power when you compare the people in solar compared to gas powered plants or nuclear or call it is absurdly high to the deck of the panel is all over and it is not an economically efficient way to make energy and doesn't deal with the core problem which is overconsuming energy and negative output so it is wrong on so many fronts. dagen: if you look at the climate agreement, to meet the