today, and it is really not a high bar for them, that he should have continued detention until full trial resumes. they made the argument that he is accused of a violent crime, a crime of terrorism. they also allege that they have a significant body of evidence to back up those claims, statements from individuals on the ground, forensic evidence. as well as statements they say khattalah made once he was captured by u.s. authorities. on the flip side, the public defender who is representing him said, that what the government really offered for continued detention were really just their conclusions. that in fact the defense did not have access to any discovery or access to any information until very early this morning. what was provided to them was extremely limited in nature. if there was sort of a moment that was kind of light hearted in the hearing, the public defender, kind of made a mockery of the government's claim that khattalah was dangerous because he was carrying a firearm at the time of his arrest, indicating