students know that the military recruiters were going to be at harvard during that recruiting season and military recruiting went up that year, not down. so you're exactly right, that the supreme court did reject our amicas brief. again, we filed an amicas brief not attacking the constitutionality of the solomon amendment but instead saying that essentially the harvard policy complied with the solomon amendment, the supreme court rejected it 9-0, unanimously. >> but even before that the military said the law was still in effect, harvard had no right to get around it, and they should comply even before the supreme court issued a ruling, and they had to contact the university's counsel and the president, mr. larry summers, and mr. summers agreed that the military should have full and equal access before even the supreme court ruled. but after you had denied
Related Keywords
Us Supreme Court , Students , Military Recruiters , Military Recruiting , Recruiting Season , Amicas , It , American Policy , Solomon Amendment , Harvard , Constitutionality , 0 , 9 , Practiced Law , Us Military , Effect , Ruling , Wasnt Equal Access , Larry Summers , Mr , President , Counsel ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.