that in this response by the white house, they never mentioned the word russia. do you think that's significant? >> that seems like a pretty big gap to me. when i saw the statement, you can imagine this actually coming out of the kremlin rather than the white house because it's so full of misinformation, and it doesn't mention russia. you literally have to look at the first page of this document and contrast it to the white house statement, and see that the white house apparently either didn't get past reading the first page or is purposefully misrepresenting information. this document addresses in detail the multi-pronged rationale for the surveillance warrant on carter page in october 2016. it wasn't just the dossier, and the white house and devin nunes in all of their statements have not once talked about russia, again, in this document, there's a line that says the doj's waurnlt request was based on compelling evidence that page was knowingly assisting clandestine russian

Related Keywords

Statement , Russia , White House , Response , Word , Kremlin , Gap , Document , It Doesn T , Page , Didn T , Misinformation , Information , Salacious Dossier , Devin Nunes , Surveillance Warrant On Carter , It Wasn T , Detail , Rationale , October 2016 , 2016 , Spy On Carter Page , Wall , Justice Department , Line , Evidence , Statements , Waurnlt Request ,