i want to be precise. peter orszag says as least for two years keep the tax rates where they are right now. >> no, wolf. he did not say at least for two years. he said do it for two years in order to get them to give them up after two years. i disagree with his political calculation. put it a different way. when the minority leader in the house of representatives is taking political advice from the economists that have left the obama administration, i guess i'm a little confused. >> here is what "the wall street journal" wrote in an editorial this week. i want you to respond. never before has government spent so much and intervened so directly in credit allocation to spur growth yet the results have been mediocre at best. in return for adding nearly $3 trillion in federal debt in two years, we still have $14.9 million unemployed. what happened? that is the question "the wall street journal" asks. what happened? >> well, what happened is we
Related Keywords
Tax Rates , Wolf Blitzer , Peter Orszag , Order , Two , Way , Advice , Minority Leader , Economists , Calculation , House Of Representatives , President Obama , Administration , Government , Growth , Results , Editorial , Credit Allocation , Wall Street Journal , Question , Debt , Return , 14 9 Million , Trillion , 3 Trillion , 4 9 Million ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.