The job state was disappointing. The job data was disappointing. Pmi came out and of was not great and it was not great. The u. S. Economy is showing signs of fatigue. An economic slowdown. Trailing data is ok. Growth in the states is strong. You have other indicators of people being nervous about trade. A lates difficult in cycle. You are very late cycle. I think we are close to the end and people have recognized. Jonathan joining me around the table. Us into have you with studio. The trailing data is ok. What does the outlook look like from your perspective . The trailing data is ok, possibly more than ok depending on what you focus on. The market in general focuses on the negative. I do not see as many headlines that we have had some of the best Mortgage Application numbers recently. Every time we get a slightly weaker avp number, at a time when we get a 50 year low in terms of unemployment, et cetera, the fact that there is a sentiment out there that persists around the fed cutting rates, it is standing to me it is astounding to me considering six months ago the market was as convinced the fed was on track to cut four times over the next 12 months. Jonathan to hike. Oksana you are correct. And now we have reversed this in and the market is expecting three cuts on, essentially, similar data. Something is not right here. I dont think powell will bow to the action and equity markets. Jonathan youre not the only one who thinks that. Capital economics wrote, we continue to expect a sharper slowdown of Economic Growth in the coming months will convince the fed to cut Interest Rates, but the retail sales data reinforces the idea that officials are likely to wait until the September Fomc meeting before pulling the trigger. George, thoughts . I think that is probably right that they will wait until september. The economy is not nearly as robust as it was last year this time, but not nearly as dire either. You are getting a lot of the gdp numbers and inflationary numbers, and they are strong overall. The fed will cut because the market is pushing them to cuts. They will have to succumb around september time. Jonathan lets talk about the treasury market. Colin, you said tenure treasury yields were going at 2 , pretty much at 2 . What now . Colin i think you have a good market with perspectives because we are headed lower. I think the fed will be put in a position that they do have to lower rates by july. I would hope they would do it earlier, but in our conversations, over the months and years, we didnt feel the four hikes last year were warranted, so they went too far, and now they have to pull them back. Sooner as opposed to later would be better, but i would forecast the 10 year treasuries be at 1. 75 before the end of the summer. Oksana this is the challenge investors are facing. Even in the best case scenario, which is lets hope the feds cut here, the ag is already above it yield and every sector has locked in its yield. Keep in mind as well, the fed is aware of the fact that their actions are going to have limited impact on the economy. Whos going to be incentivized to do at 2. 25 that they arent doing a 2. 5 . Their actions can have serious effects on inflating assets. Jonathan george, if you look at expectations for easing, worldwide in Central Banks across the Federal Reserve, the ecb, the boj, the whole lot, investors markets price for all of it. At the same time, we are also pricing for the policy effort to work. For that policy effort not to work. If you look at the fiveyear five year end essay europe, at the moment, look at inflation and growth expectations. We might be pricing in easing, but are we pricing in this stuff working . I dont know if we are. Inflationary expectations are at lows. Breakevens are at 170 type of level. Overseas, it is even worse. 114 in the europe area. I think the challenges what does i think the challenge is what does the fed do at this point . As challenging as it is domestically, it is more challenging overseas. This is a global phenomenon. You see this slowdown globally, and it does the fed react . I think they have to in the u. S. And overseas as well. Jonathan the basic assumption is the fed cuts. The main question is, what are the rate cut 101 trades i need to put on right now for what the fed cuts . The problem is that all of this is determined by so many different variables, conditioned by so many different variables. Not just the first cut. How many cuts . Is this a deep rate cut cycle . What about all of the other variables in the trade story . To put it together, there is not much consistency in what trade you should put on and what performs. It comes down to the basic question with a complex answer, what is the outlook for growth . After they start cutting, does it change . Does it improve . Do you have an answer for that . Colin i think it marginally improves, but with our forecast in my forecast, it will stay contained and muted. Im talking about a situation where we have low inflation, or virtually no inflation, stocks stuck at zero, and this is not just domestically, but globally. Interest rates will be lower for longer, gdp growth will be lower for longer, and rates will be lower for longer. What the market is missing is how many eases will happen in the course of this. As george mentioned, the fed has lost control. They are beholden to the market. If investors say you will ease in july, they will ease in july. Oksana if the fed does ease in july, we agree that will not have tremendous impacts on price action, because it is priced in. What is priced in is three more hikes. It considers an area which the fed goes through with three more hikes. What does that mean . We are sitting at an inflection point. If we get the hikes, which would be a great thing for fixed income, you will have a repricing of risk affecting areas like high yield, which are trading rich loans. If you dont get hikes, you will have to see the market move up to what the fed is currently communicating, which is, we are not doing much of anything. You will have a repricing on Interest Rates. This is the time to be defensive. This is the time when defense wins championships. To your point, john, i dont think this is the time to be aggressive with any sort of positioning. Colin i agree with that last statement. You have to take some type of risk in the market. We are favoring Duration Risk. We dont like credit risk at this point. The fundamental has been weakening. You have to take some type of risk. You also have to go into the sectors and down into structures and do it on the individual basis. It is more detailed than the broader risk. Jonathan we will explore that later in the program. A basic exercise to how people get their heads around this bond market is priced is the question i explored earlier today, which is where will rates be in five years . Take the ecb, Federal Reserve for instance. Take the ecb, its not higher than zero over the next five years. You have to ask yourself, will the policy rate be higher than it is now in five years time with the fed . George lower. Jonathan most people would say lower. What does that mean for the bond market in the here and now. . Colin it means it could be more attractive than some might think. In defense of george, looking at duration, i dont have a problem with that whatsoever. Not only will rates go lower, as we mentioned the fed moves and that there would be more moves than currently priced in the market. I think you would have movement within the fiveyear timeframe. One and 3 8 sounds like a decent ittral tendency for where might be five years from now, that is a long time to look. I would also say we would have a point where we would go below 1 before it came back to somewhere like 1. 5. One of the thing i would like to point out with respect to where we are with why the fed might need to really look at the markets and think about what they will do is this three month tenure inversion. They should be worried about it. They should be seriously worried. If they can adjust and help that inversion come closure or be rates,erted by lowering to me that is a good thing. Jonathan Colin Robinson will stick with us and george and oksana. Coming up, oil prices are doing little to derail the junk bonds climbing to fresh record highs. Thats coming up next. This is bloomberg real yield. Jonathan im Jonathan Ferro and this is bloomberg real yield. I would like to begin over in europe where governments are paying less than ever before to erase funds and several debt markets. Tenure bunds is yielding a record low, 0. 2. Warren Buffetts Berkshire hathaway is telling the biggest sterling bond in almost two years. They 1. 75 billion pound deal drew 5. 3 billion pounds of offers. The offering is coming in four parts with the longest portion a 30year security yielding 1. 82 Percentage Points above treasury. Back with me is oksana, george, and colin. Lets talk about it. Where should you be taking risks . Colin was taking about taking Duration Risk. Duration risk versus credit risk right now. Oksana . Oksana neither, but taking Duration Risk is astounding to me, considering threemonth a 60 basis points above the fiveyear treasury. Why would you want to take Duration Risk here . Not to mention, if you think across the pond, why would you pay the government over there for their debt . You are an investor in germany and cant earn returned by lending money to the government. Astounding. In terms of which risk to take it, when i talk about defensiveness, that does not mean taking on duration, which is what it used to mean in prior cycles. It means highquality floatingrate orientation in our portfolios. Things like Investment Grade floaters, opportunities in the mortgage credit rates, opportunities tied to the consumer. The consumer is doing well as the recent retail number supports consumers. 70 of the u. S. Economy. The bottom line is, be constructive on the economy. Very bearish on prices. Prices dont allow for much appreciation. Jonathan the bank of america is taking the same line as you, saying that the market was misreading cuts. Something has to give here. Either risk needs to be marked down or rates need to go higher. Which is it . Oksana rates should be higher. Academically, what are rates . The rate of inflation plus growth. And 2007, you got 90 of the 10 year treasury. Currently, if you add those two, you get 40 . We still have inflation and we still do have growth. Our rates dont reflect it because they are entirely, artificially suppressed. Central banks here and across the bond. George i agree that they are. I dont think it changes soon. When you look globally at rates, right now, our 10year looks attractive at 24 and they give 25 basis point overseas. If you have that mechanism 25 basis point overseas. If you have that mechanism, and that capital coming over here to get lower rates, where is that coming from . I think, for the shortterm, play the duration game. The credit side is more concerning. Oksana that is likely the real reason for the inversion we are seeing, the demand from overseas. How do you square that with liking highyield . It is not really an indicator if you do believe it is an indicator of slowing down, how do you square that with risk if you think the inverted curve is hardening . Jonathan you like highyield. Walk us through it. Colin this is all premised on the fact that growth stays low but doesnt go below zero. Inflation stays very low and is stuck at the low level, and then Interest Rates are going to move down. When i consider highyield, and i get it, 8. 9 year returns, i i get where she would come from. That is quite a returned you have had in this period of time. I would look back and think about last december and the start of the year, nobody would have forecasted we would have had a 9 yeartodate return. If you go with where rates would be on my thought process, the fed will have to move more than the market thinks and investors think. Also, i dont dislike credit, of course, but we could basically, clip that the coupon. There is a search for yield globally. If im going to click the coupon in highyield for the rest of the year, i like it. Jonathan that argument is an argument made on this program many times, especially the last couple of months. You can pull down the volatility within your portfolio by taking out equity and pushing in highyield. You will not miss out much on the upside. Is that the argument you are essentially making today . Colin that is one of the arguments we always make. If you look at last december, and the more recent periods this year, volatility has been much preferred to equities. That is part of our thought process and why we like it. Jonathan the issue i have is the amount of people that say get defensive. I see that triple sees are cs are outperforming. I see the triple bs outperform the singleas. When people Start Talking about going up in quality, i see that playing out in the price action highyield, not so much in Investment Grade. Why not, oksana . Oksana triple bs have become a very interesting place because the size of the triple b market has dwarfed the size of highyield market. Even if you are constructive on highyield fundamentals, which we are, one of the reasons we arent jumping into that space is because triple bs, just by way of their fundamentals alone, should go through a much much more significant downgrade cycle. Why are they outperforming . They have become somewhat of a proxy for higher yield exposure in Investment Grade. You can pick up a coupon and all of the demand is going there. You are starting to see more and highyield atf, et cetera. Highyield etfs et cetera. It is a technical story which could reverse. That will choke the highyield market and, therefore, we go back to this mantra of be defensive, have liquidity at the ready, this will happen. Jonathan just to explore triple b, we go into a decelerating growth environment and the triple b universe starts to get downgraded, then we have real problems. The Global Market is almost priced to perfection. I know that gets thrown around loosely, but what i mean by that is treasuries have been big because people are looking for rate cuts. What i found interesting in this week is when we got the broadcom release at the back end of the week. The information was not in the press release, it was in the equity. When the press release came out, they said it would be a tough year. Really . That is a surprise . Apparently it was a surprise for equity. Why i think this is important is because maybe we have not factored in the decelerating growth environment in the second half of this year and what it might mean for risk assets. We have priced rate cuts, but are also pricing in the soft landing. Are you happy to say, am i constructive about the second half . I will get the rate cuts, and where we are priced now will be validated, but risk assets as well . George i think thats a good point. Right now, what are the fundamentals telling us . Fundamentals have been weakening. You are looking at highyield and see leverage creeping up, see coverage ratios weaken, margins weakening. The question is, does the market care . People are grabbing yield. They are grabbing yield no matter what the fundamentals are underlying. The market does not care. When does that catch up . In the next six to 12 months. Along the way, you can clip coupons. It is an ok trade, but with the risk associated with it, it is pretty high. From a riskreward perspective, you will get some reward but take a lot of risk. Jonathan george is sticking with us as well as oksana and collin. I want to give you a market check. Treasury yields are as follows. We creep lower on the twoyear by a single basis point at 24. 1. 84. Rather unchanged going into an fomc decision. Still ahead as the final spread. The week ahead featuring the fed decision and a News Conference with chair powell. That is next in this is bloomberg real yield. Jonathan im Jonathan Ferro. This is bloomberg real yield and over the next week, what a week ahead we got. It starts on monday. Mario draghi speaking from portugal. Tuesday housing starts. Wednesday, a fed decision. Thursday, a Rate Decision from the boj. Friday, pmi data from the eurozone and from the United States as well. With me around the table is oksana, george, and collin still with us. A viewer question comes in and i want to ask, we have spent so many weeks exploring what you should and should not do when the fed starts to cut Interest Rates. What if they dont . What if they dont signal one next week . What happens in this market . Oksana markets react. They start to move up to what the fed has been communicating all along. The cuts have been priced in. To expect really dramatic price action on the back of a cut i think is overly optimistic. What we should expect is, in terms of a price reaction, if the fed does nothing, they want to continue to appear independent, but that is a different story. Jonathan lets get to the rapidfire round. We will start with the Federal Reserve. Looking ahead to next week, the first question, does the fed drop the rotation from the goingp the word patient into next week . George yes. Oksana no. Colin absolutely. Jonathan five years from now, will the fed policy rate be higher or lower than now . Oksana higher. George lower. Colin lower. Jonathan the third and final question. On credit, and ive asked this before, have we seen the credit tides of this cycle, yes or no . Colin no. A search for yield. Oksana we have not. That is why you have to sell, because it is easy to sell right now. George i agree with that. You need to sell right now. Jonathan oksana, george, colin, great to catch up with you. Thats it from us from new york. See you next week. 1 00 p. M. New york time, 6 00 p. M. New york time. This was bloomberg real yield. This is bloomberg tv. Were the slowskys. We like drip coffee, layovers and waiting on hold. What we dont like is relying on fancy technology for help. Snail mail we were invited to a y2k party. Uh, didnt that happen, like, 20 years ago . Oh, look, karolyn, weve got a mathematician on our hands check it out now you can schedule a callback or reschedule an appointment, even on nights and weekends. Todays xfinity service. Simple. Easy. Awesome. Id rather not. Haslinda hello, im Haslinda Amin in singapore. Shes the pinkhaired founder and ceo of a 2 billion tech company, a woman willing to take risks. Her company, blackline, services the need of one fifth of the fortune 500 giants like boeing. Therese tucker is todays high flyer. Raised in a building in los angeles, therese tuckers