Since 2017 the movement pressing for government disclosure of UAP documents has picked up avalanche force. It is now crashing down on the U.S. Congress. It is also now widely recognized and accepted that scientists should have access to as much data as possible to conduct research on anomalous aerial reports. Resistance to disclosure is frequently justified by government claims that disclosure would put national security in jeopardy. Most scientific researchers accept this. Yet, some voices seem to scream for disclosure even if the wall of national security gets breached. Is this a good idea? There may be good arguments to support disclosure only to the extent that national security remains protected. Against UAP Disclosure? No. But national security deserves security.

Related Keywords

Berkeley , California , United States , Louisiana , Washington , San Antonio , Texas , Graduate Theological Union , Jensine Andresen , Jacques Vallee , Uncle Sam , Martinez Hewlett , Russell Gordon , Ted Peters , Joseph Seckbach , Steven Greer , Robert Powell , Octavio Chon Torres , Joshua Moritz , Robert John Russell , Marvin Gouw , Scientific Coalition , Theological Union , National Security , Natural Sciences , Disclosure To Protect National Security , Doctor Andresen , Protect National , Theology Meet Extraterrestrial Intelligence , Public Policy , Brian Patrick Green , Religious Transhumanism , Its Critics , Louisiana State Director , Ancient Aliens , Religious Yearnings , Career Press New Page Books , Scientist Explains What , Alien Contact ,